chore: update docker-compose for additional host configuration test: add unit tests for LineCrossCounter and WindowIdentityResolver functionality
32 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# Task Plan
|
|
|
|
## Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [x] Confirm the current `store_dwell_alert` half-hour report path and identify the runtime control point.
|
|
- [x] Verify the plan covers behavior change, focused tests, deployment scope, and post-deploy validation.
|
|
- [ ] Update focused tests so `half_hour_report` is expected on rolling 1800-second windows from startup time.
|
|
- [ ] Implement the rolling window behavior in `store_dwell_alert` runtime code.
|
|
- [ ] Run focused `store_dwell_alert` tests for the changed slice.
|
|
- [ ] Deploy the updated `store_dwell_alert` code to `xiaozheng@10.8.0.11` and restart only the affected service(s).
|
|
- [ ] Validate the remote deployment and update the Review section with evidence.
|
|
|
|
## Scope And Risks
|
|
|
|
- Scope: change `managed/store_dwell_alert` so `half_hour_report` uses rolling 1800-second windows from service startup instead of natural `:00` / `:30` boundaries, then deploy the change to `10.8.0.11`.
|
|
- Expected touch points: `managed/store_dwell_alert/app/modules/dwell_engine.py`, `managed/store_dwell_alert/app/modules/reporter.py`, and focused tests under `managed/store_dwell_alert/tests/`.
|
|
- Risk: changing the window model can alter `window_start` and `window_end` values consumed by downstream webhook receivers and manage APIs.
|
|
- Risk: a delayed observation call may span more than one 30-minute window; the implementation should behave predictably and avoid duplicate emissions for the same window.
|
|
- Risk: deployment should be limited to `store-dwell-alert` unless code or config diffs prove broader scope is required.
|
|
|
|
## Validation Intent
|
|
|
|
- First pin the new expected behavior with focused tests.
|
|
- After the code change, run the narrowest `store_dwell_alert` tests that cover report timing and report payloads.
|
|
- After deployment, verify the remote service is healthy and that the deployed code matches local content.
|
|
|
|
## Review
|
|
|
|
- Status: in progress.
|
|
- Result: pending.
|
|
- Verification: pending.
|